Stephen Hawking
Walter Cronkite Astronauts Integratron Harry Truman Dwight Eisenhower Jimmy Carter Ronald Reagan Edgar Mitchell Stephen Hawking Ed Asner Phoenix Lights Mexico City Ancient Aliens Abductions 1953

Home Up



"Of course it is possible that UFO's really do contain aliens as many people believe, and the government is hushing it up" Comment by Stephen Hawking on C Span Television.


Cambridge University physicist, Stephen Hawking was the guest lecturer at the second Millennium Evening at the White House on March 6, 1998. With President Bill and Hillary Clinton looking on, Stephen Hawking admitted the possibility of a UFO cover-up during the C-Span television's coverage of "Imagination and Change: Science in the Next Millennium." Professor Stephen Hawking often considered one of brightest men on Earth, who authored "A Brief History of Time" was a guest lecturer. Stephen Hawking after comments about the growth of population and scientific knowledge stated, "Clearly the present exponential growth cannot continue indefinitely. So what will happen? One possibility is that we wipe ourselves out completely by some disaster such as a nuclear war. "There is a sick joke that the reason we have not been visited by extra-terrestrials is that when a civilization reaches our stage of development it becomes unstable and destroys itself. "Of course it is possible that UFO's really do contain aliens as many people believe, and the government is hushing it up" I wouldn't like to comment on that. "Personally I believe there is a different explanation why we have not been contacted, but I won't go into it here. "However, even without that, there is a very real danger that we will kill everything on this planet now that we have the technological power to do so. Even if we don't destroy ourselves completely, there is a possibility that we might descend into a state of brutalization and barbarity like the opening scene of "Terminator": Thanks to Pat and Tony Craddock,

Stephen Hawking Quotes

I have sold more books on physics than Madonna has on sex.
My body may be stuck in this chair, but with the internet my mind can go to the ends of the universe.
If, like me, you have looked at the stars and tried to make sense of what you see, you have started to wonder what makes the universe exist. The questions are clear and deceptively simple but the answers have always been beyond our reach – until now.
…both time and space are finite in extent, but they don’t have my boundary or edge… there would be no singularities, and the laws of science would hold everywhere, including at the beginning of the universe.
There are grounds for cautious optimism that we may now be near the end of the search for the ultimate laws of nature.
My goal is simple. It is complete understanding of the universe, why it is as it is and why it exists at all.
I think computer viruses should count as life. I think it says something about human nature that the only form of life we have created so far is purely destructive. We’ve created life in our own image.
To confine our attention to terrestrial matters would be to limit the human spirit.
We cannot predict what comes out of a singularity…. It is a disaster for science.
God not only plays dice, he throws them in the corner where you can’t see them.
It matters if you just don’t give up.
What I have done is to show that it is possible for the way the universe began to be determined by the laws of science. In that case, it would not be necessary to appeal to God to decide how the universe began. This doesn’t prove that there is no God, only that God is not necessary.
I’m sure my disability has a bearing on why I’m well known. People are fascinated by the contrast between my very limited physical powers, and the vast nature of the universe I deal with.
Even if there is only one possible unified theory, it is just a set of rules and equations. What is it that breathes fire into the equations and makes a universe for them to describe ? The usual approach of science of constructing a mathematical model cannot answer the questions of why there should be a universe for the model to describe. Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing ?
I think that science itself is morally neutral. But scientists themselves need not be morally neutral…. They have moral responsibilities.


Copyright © 2010 Tim Stouse
Last modified: December 10, 2010
All 3rd Party Copyrights © are acknowledged.
Material reproduced here is for educational and research purposes only.